David Worrall

Worrall, David. “Computational Designing of Sonic Morphologies.” Organised Sound, vol. 25, no. 1, 2020, pp. 15–24. 





 

 









Worrall, David, editor. “Computation in the Sonic Arts.” Organised Sound, vol. 25, no. 1, 2020.  







STATEMENT:

Organised Sound is an international peer-reviewed journal which focuses on the rapidly developing methods and issues arising from the use of technology in music today. It concentrates upon the impact which the application of technology is having upon music in a variety of genres, including multimedia, performance art, sound sculpture and music ranging from popular idioms to experimental electroacoustic composition.

I have been a contributor and editor for Organised Sound for 25 years. This issue, Computation in the Sonic Arts seeks to go beyond descriptions of how specific compositional procedures are used in individual compositions in order to address the social and musicological dimensions of computation. In doing so, it aims to stimulate conversation and interdisciplinary communication about the activity of computational design as it applies to the sonic arts and the temporal arts more generally.

My own article, Computational Designing of Sonic Morphologies, examines the origin and consequences of a materialist sound-object mindset in which the hierarchical organization of sonic events, especially those developed through notational abstraction, are often considered, erroneously, I argue, antithetical to sounds ‘being themselves’. Instead, that musical sounds are not just material objects, and that musical notations, on paper or in computer code, are not just symbolic abstractions, but instructions for embodied actions between resonators and (often human) actuators. When notation is employed computationally to control resonance and gestural actuators at multiple acoustic, psychoacoustic and conceptual levels of music form, it is possible for vibrant sonic morphologies to emerge and be sustained from the quantum-like boundaries between them. I argue that, in order to achieve that result, it is necessary to replace our primary focus of compositional attention from the Digital Audio Workstation sound transformation tools currently in vogue, with those that support algorithmic thinking at all levels of compositional design. This will afford the reinstatement of the use of symbolic logics in electroacoustic composition at multiple structural levels from microsound resonance generation and activation to corporally-informed gesture models. Further, it offers the potential to stimulate and enable the creation of new alliances between the capacity of our auditory processing to produce only weak cognitive bindings to unknown sound sources and symbolic structures, and in doing so, enable metaphorical cognitive sub-conscious forms to emerge.